pinstorm
home
blog

We created a questionnaire to find out which business news channel on TV is the most popular in India. We wanted to find out what business channels, according to the users, presented better market analysis, were able to influence commodity and stock trading decisions and had the best coverage at various times of the day.

We posted the survey on Twitter and were glad to receive 54 responses. We believe the responses are a fair indicator of the questions asked in the survey.

As promised, here are the unedited results of the survey, ‘Business TV Channels: Your views ’. Click on the images for a larger graph:

image

  1

2

3

4

This data from 54 entries cannot be extrapolated. For more details, feel free to write to us at info@pinstorm.com.

[Source]

by Sana Vishwanath

Microsoft takes Google head-on with its ‘decision engine’ Bing. And Honda reworks its marketing strategy for its premium hatchback Jazz!

[Link]

by Durgesh Gupta

Pinstorm Technologies, set up in 2004 by Passionfund’s Mahesh Murthy who’s currently its chief executive officer, was perhaps the only pure-play search engine marketing firm since inception. The impetus for SEM came around in 2004, with individual investors from eBay, Cisco and Intel backing his venture, but the investors own barely 5 per cent of the company.

What is the inception story of Pinstorm?
I have been in the media business since 1984, but over time I saw advertising break up and got two separate ways into a brokerage business and a consulting business. After 15 years in this business, I realised that because you never got paid for your good work, you could never get rich.

In 2004, I started Pinstorm in a 550 square foot office with one person, and we proudly declared ourselves the first pay-for-performance advertising firm in the world. We did something truly crazy – we didn’t charge a retainer, we didn’t charge for creative, we didn’t charge a media commission – in fact, we paid for media from our own pockets – but we put it all together – and charged the clients on the basis of the results our campaigns delivered.

Our clients were curious at first. When they saw results coming in, our business grew as theirs grew. In fact, once we moved them to this model, they didn’t question us on the creatives or the media plans – but only on the results.

Who are your biggest competitors today?
We have a few types of competition. After we started offering performance advertising, we have helped change the market in India – today over 65 per cent of the digital ad market in India is performance-driven and we are the leading player.

Many independent digital agencies had to change their models to match our offering. So there are a couple of smaller performance ad firms, who copy our every move. We keep a close eye on them.

That apart, we have the digital arms of the big ad agencies. We are not so worried about them, because they don’t have the flexibility, the technology and the approach we have to delivering results to the client – but they are good at client service.

Moving ahead, do you feel that social networks are better for branding?
Social networks are not useful for ROI based advertising and relatively they are better for brand awareness advertising. Unlike search, where people go to a site like Google or Yahoo to click away and go somewhere else, social networks are impressive and users tend not to click on ads here.

So don’t expect a high click-through rate on ads on social networks, which can hence be better used for general demographically or behaviorally targeted brand messaging.

What pros and cons do you see for advertisers on social networks?
Social networks are a double-edged sword for advertisers. On the one hand, they offer large numbers of prime young audiences with high purchasing power, who spend a lot of time online.

While typical viewership of a TV programme might be in the 10-15 minute range, the successful networks are used for 3 to 5 times as much. And the audience is more urban, more influential and more amenable to new brand messaging.

On the other hand, the very popularity of social networks can be the problem – people are going there not to see ads or click on them – or even to get entertained, like they go to a TV channel. They are going there to connect with friends, acquaintances, lovers and the like.

So, they’re not exactly in a mood to welcome brand messaging and you run the risk of somewhat becoming wallpaper on Orkut or Facebook. But then again, most advertising on television has a similar fate.

What kind of brand is benefited the most on social networks?
Social networks will be happy hunting grounds for brands which have a core focus around the urban young between 18 and 35 years, with high disposable incomes, and who are trend-setters by nature.

In addition, there are also vertically specialised social networks like LinkedIn, Xing and such. We use these for B2B advertising, where advertisers like large consultancies, IT/ITES companies, can be run very well.

Do you think the only factor attracting online advertising in this recessionary time is the cost?
Well in these recessionary times, the choice that marketers are making is between brand awareness and response generation advertising. And the former is losing ground to the latter. So the big gainer is actually response – generation advertising online – publishers like Google and others who offer pay-per-click or pay-for-result solutions.

The media losing business across the board is awareness media. I can only imagine that social networks are losing out as much as television channels are. After this down phase is over, I predict a strong growth in online awareness ad options, including social networks.

What are the factors that advertisers should keep in mind while deciding on social networks?
Most importantly, who are you talking to ? Depending on which social networks you choose, you can target by age, sex, location – or even by interest, keyword or forum.

So you have both demographic and behavioural axes to make a media pick on. Use both. After this, realise that people aren’t coming there to click on your ads. Do not harbour hopes of high click through rates.

Further, if you want to engage audiences, you have to try harder than just doing a flat banner ad. Try interactivity, humour, fun – remember you have to make it more compelling content than what your friends are saying to you online.

The 140 Characters Conference (140conf) is a conference in NYC on the June 16-17 2009, about the effects of Twitter on various industries. Mahesh Murthy of Pinstorm was invited to speak there. Here is his presentation:

 

Here is Mahesh’s video from the event:

Mahesh at the 140Conf in NY

Mahesh’s pic, courtesy @lauriemeisel

Some stats about this post (because we all like numbers):

  • Mahesh was one of two Indians invited to speak at 140Conf.
  • This post first went up 15 minutes after his presentation there.
  • One tweet from @Pinstorm generated 211 visits in half an hour. The number currently stands at 328.
  • This one tweet generated 25 conversations on Twitter.
  • The presentation was favourited by SlideShare and showcased on the front page.
  • It was viewed 214 times on SlideShare alone.

[Link]

by Shivani Mohan

FOUNDER and chief executive officer of Pinstorm, the world’s first pay-for-performance digital marketing firm, Mahesh Murthy has made his own rules for success.

Murthy, 43, has worked with some of the leading multinational ad agencies – Grey in India and Ogilvy in Hong Kong, spearheading campaigns for HP, Nike, Coca Cola and The Economist. He wrote and directed a spot for MTV voted “Asia’s best commercial of the decade”.

He helped launch the first commercial version of Yahoo! in 1995 and the Earth’s Biggest Bookstore campaign for Amazon.com in 1997. Murthy also consulted with Star TV, launching its youth vehicle, Channel V, and creating a net and TV presence for it.

He played the Donald Trump-equivalent role in Business Baazigar, an Indian game show similar to The Apprentice, involving entrepreneurs and business plans. In 2006, Mahesh helped set up Seedfund, an early-stage venture capital fund in India. Pinstorm, headquartered at Mumbai, has more than 120 staff.

Mahesh spoke recently with Khaleej Times. Following are excerpts from the interview:

How did the idea for Pinstorm occur to you?

I love advertising. I’ve been in the business since 1984 – but over time I saw advertising break up and go two separate ways… into a brokerage business and a consulting business. If I was to use a financial analogy – rather than run a hedge fund or a portfolio, it meant that you had to pay one man a flat fee for advice and another to simply trade the shares. This almost never works for you in finance – and it certainly doesn’t work for you in advertising.

After 15 years in this business, I knew I loved it, but I realised that because you never got paid for your good work, you could never get rich. I looked around me — there were no advertising billionaires — and not too many millionaires either. And there were no ad firms in the Fortune 500. The work was great – but (not) the business… So I got out and moved over to the marketing side of things, invested in startups and such, till I saw the rise of something interesting.

Google was the medium that first opened my eyes to a curious form of advertising. On Google, you didn’t pay for your ad – or sponsored link – to appear. You paid only if the consumer responded to it and clicked on it. When I thought about it I figured that this was perhaps the kind of advertising I was waiting for – pay-for-performance.

So I started Pinstorm in 2004 in a 550 square foot office with one person, and we proudly declared ourselves the first pay-for-performance advertising firm in the world. We did something truly crazy – we didn’t charge a retainer, we didn’t charge for creative, we didn’t charge a media commission – in fact, we paid for media from our own pockets – but we put it all together – and charged the clients on the basis of the results our campaigns delivered.

What was the initial response to this model of advertising?

Our clients were curious at first. When they saw results coming in, they were excited – and our business grew as theirs grew. In fact, once we moved them to this model, they didn’t question us on the creatives or the media plans – but only on the results. And happy clients talk to other clients.

From then till a few months ago, in the first 5 years, we never had to actually make a cold call to pitch a client in India – we were invited every time by word of mouth – that was the power of the concept we had.

But of course, pay-for-performance was not the only problem we wanted to solve in advertising. Another big issue is that ad agencies say they’ll build consistent global brands — and they do so for everybody, except themselves. A McDonalds and a Pepsi are the same around the world – but a JWT and Bates are different in every city they are in. So I was clear that we had to change the way strategy and ads are created.

We learned from Infosys and Wipro here — building a strong, centralised creative and media team in India that worked on all brands around the world. It allowed us to offer a consistent quality of creative and results to all our clients globally.

Again, nobody else in the world has done this –and we think it’ll have great benefits for us in the long run.

The third thing we tried was to be global from as early as possible. Most Indian and UAE agencies stay local — we set up offices in Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Beijing, San Francisco, Delhi, Zurich and Bangalore – all on our own steam, all with no (venture capital) investors, and all with no foreign big brother. It’s started paying off. We now handle a few clients globally already — and we hope to grow this side of our business over the next few years a lot.

Who are your biggest competitors today?

We have a few types of competition. After we started offering performance advertising, we’ve perhaps helped change the market in India – today over 65 per cent of the digital ad market in India is performance-driven and we’re the leading player…. Many independent digital agencies had to change their models to match our offering. So there are a couple of smaller performance ad firms who copy our every move. We keep a close eye on them.

That apart, we have the digital arms of the big ad agencies. We’re not so worried about them, because they don’t have the flexibility, the technology and the approach we have to delivering results to the client – but they’re good at client service. So we have to match their service levels to be able to win clients away from them.

The third, the category I always worry about- is the small and hungry ones. These are the tiny startups which are motivated to take us on, like we were once motivated to take on the WPPs of the world. I’m always afraid that we’ve become the large firm that smaller firms like us used to once take potshots at.

Does Pinstorm, have any plans for expansion, especially in the Middle East?

Pinstorm’s premise is to manage global brands with consistence and through pay-for-performance. To support this, we will soon need an EMEA office, and hence the Middle East is certainly on our radar.